In the discourse on digital transformation, we often hear that data silos are enemies to be torn down. But in the reality of large organizations, they are neither an anomaly nor a defect to be corrected at all costs. Rather, they reflect the natural diversity of businesses, the complexity of information systems and regulatory requirements.
Each department builds its own vision of data according to its own objectives. Marketing focuses on interactions, sales on opportunities, finance on flows. So it's not surprising that the same customer is represented differently in a CRM, ERP or e-commerce database.
Some silos are also inherited from the company's history: critical business software, systems resulting from acquisitions, or separation imposed by compliance requirements such as RGPD or sector-specific regulations .
Removing these silos would be tantamount to denying operational reality. What's needed is to learn how to make them interact.
The problem is not the existence of silos, but the inability to connect them when necessary. As AI, BI and data governance projects multiply, the need for cross-data explodes:
Without bridges, decisions are based on fragmented data. And governance becomes theoretical.
This is where an effective strategy comes into play: reconciliation. This involves linking entities spread across different systems, without forcing them to adopt a single model. This work relies on several levers:
Rather than imposing a single vision, this approach respects the diversity of sources while guaranteeing a consolidated view.
As part of a project to migrate to a new CRM solution, a company needed to make reliable a history of data spread over several systems: old CRM, ERP, business files, etc. Each source presented a different view of the customer, with format discrepancies, duplicates, missing fields and inconsistent data.
The aim was not to eliminate these silos, but to make them interact intelligently to prepare a unified database.
An automated audit detected anomalies at various levels (cell, row, column). Fuzzy matching rules were used to identify duplicates between databases, then business rules were applied to homogenize formats, enrich certain values and make the whole system more reliable.
Thanks to continuous supervision, the business teams and the IT Department were able to monitor changes in quality, correct them as they went along, and significantly reduce the risks associated with the project.
The result: a secure migration, consolidated data, and improved collaboration between silos.
📄 Read the full use case: Data reliability before migration to a new tool
A cross-silo reconciliation strategy offers tangible benefits:
Tale of Data enables companies to intelligently connect their existing systems, monitor data quality in each silo, correct identified errors via simple, visual rules, and document every action in a governance logic.
It's another way of making data a strategic lever: not by rebuilding everything, but by reconciling better.
📅 Book an appointment with a Tale of Data expert for a personalized diagnosis. 👉 Request a demo